| HOME > MISC > LINUX > RAID & LVM |
|---|
I hope to turn this into a general easy to follow guide to setting up RAID-5 and LVM on a modern Linux system. However, for now it's basically a collection of my notes as I experimented on my own systems. Please note that my own experimentation was based on the RAID and LVM implementations under Fedora Core 3 & 4, as wel as Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4, all of which are based on the 2.6 series of kernels. These instructions may or may not work with other versions or distros. I'm not an expert (yet) in either Software RAID or LVM so please use the comment section below for corrections and comments. Recent changes are highlighted in yellow.
The first is RAID-1 which is also known as mirroring. With RAID-1 it's basically done with two essentially identical drives, each with a complete set of data. The second, the one I will mostly refer to in this guide is RAID-5 which is set up using three or more drives with the data spread in a way that any one drive failing will not result in data loss. The Red Hat website has a great overview of the RAID Levels.
There is one limitation with Linux Software RAID that a /boot partition can only reside on a RAID-1 array.
Linux supports both several hardware RAID devices but also software RAID which allows you to use any IDE or SCSI drives as the physical devices. In all cases I'll refer to software RAID.
LVM stands for Logical Volume Manager and is a way of grouping drives and/or partition in a way where instead of dealing with hard and fast physical partitions the data is managed in a virtual basis where the virtual partitions can be resized. The Red Hat website has a great overview of the Logical Volume Manager.
There is one limitation that a LVM cannot be used for the /boot.
In my case I have two systems with RAID arrays, one with two 73G SCSI drives running RAID-1 (mirroring) and my other test system is configured with three 120G IDE drives running RAID-5. In most cases I will refer to my RAID-5 configuration as that will be more typical.
I have an extra IDE controller in my system to allow me to support the use of more than 4 IDE devices which caused a very odd drive assignment. The order doesn't seem to bother the Linux kernel so it doesn't bother me. My basic configuration is as follows:
hda 120G driveThe first step is to create the physical partitions on each drive that will be part of the RAID array. In my case I want to use each 120G drive in the array in it's entirety. All the drives are partitioned identically so for example, this is how hda is partitioned:
hdb 120G drive
hde 60G boot drive not on RAID array
hdf 120G drive
hdg CD-ROM drive
Disk /dev/hda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes 16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 232581 cylinders Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 1 232581 117220792+ fd Linux raid autodetectSo now with all three drives with a partitioned with id fd Linux raid autodetect you can go ahead and combine the partitions into a RAID array:
# /sbin/mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md0 --level=5 --raid-devices=3 \ /dev/hdb1 /dev/hda1 /dev/hdf1Wow, that was easy. That created a special device /dev/md0 which can be used instead of a physical partition. You can check on the status of that RAID array with the mdadm command:
# /sbin/mdadm --detail /dev/md0
Version : 00.90.01
Creation Time : Wed May 11 20:00:18 2005
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 234436352 (223.58 GiB 240.06 GB)
Device Size : 117218176 (111.79 GiB 120.03 GB)
Raid Devices : 3
Total Devices : 3
Preferred Minor : 0
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Fri Jun 10 04:13:11 2005
State : clean
Active Devices : 3
Working Devices : 3
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
UUID : 36161bdd:a9018a79:60e0757a:e27bb7ca
Events : 0.10670
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 3 1 0 active sync /dev/hda1
1 3 65 1 active sync /dev/hdb1
2 33 65 2 active sync /dev/hdf1
The important lines to see are the State line which should
say clean otherwise there might be a problem.
At the bottom you should make sure that the State column always
says active sync which says each device is
actively in the array. You could potentially have a spare device
that's on-hand should any drive should fail. If you have a spare
you'll see it listed as such here.
One thing you'll see above if you're paying attention is the fact that the size of the array is 240G but I have three 120G drives as part of the array. That's because the extra space is used as extra parity data that is needed to survive the failure of one of the drives.
Anyway, here are the steps to then add this RAID array to the LVM system. The first command pvcreate will "initialize a disk or partition for use by LVM". The second command vgcreate will then create the Volume Group, in my case I called it lvm-raid:
# pvcreate /dev/md0 # vgcreate lvm-raid /dev/md0The default value for the physical extent size can be too low for a large RAID array. In those cases you'll need to specify the -s option with a larger than default physical extent size. The default is only 4MB as of the version in Fedora Core 5. The maximum number of physical extents is approximately 65k so take your maximum volume size and divide it by 65k then round it to the next nice round number. For example, to successfully create a 550G RAID let's figure that's approximately 550,000 megabytes and divide by 65,000 which gives you roughly 8.46. Round it up to the next nice round number and use 16M (for 16 megabytes) as the physical extent size and you'll be fine:
# vgcreate -s 16M <volume group name>Ok, you've created a blank receptacle but now you have to tell how many Physical Extents from the physical device (/dev/md0 in this case) will be allocated to this Volume Group. In my case I wanted all the data from /dev/md0 to be allocated to this Volume Group. If later I wanted to add additional space I would create a new RAID array and add that physical device to this Volume Group.
To find out how many PEs are available to me use the vgdisplay command to find out how many are available and now I can create a Logical Volume using all (or some) of the space in the Volume Group. In my case I call the Logical Volume lvm0.
# vgdisplay lvm-raid . . Free PE / Size 57235 / 223.57 GB # lvcreate -l 57235 lvm-raid -n lvm0In the end you will have a device you can use very much like a plain 'ol partition called /dev/lvm-raid/lvm0. You can now check on the status of the Logical Volume with the lvdisplay command. The device can then be used to to create a filesystem on.
# lvdisplay /dev/lvm-raid/lvm0
--- Logical volume ---
LV Name /dev/lvm-raid/lvm0
VG Name lvm-raid
LV UUID FFX673-dGlX-tsEL-6UXl-1hLs-6b3Y-rkO9O2
LV Write Access read/write
LV Status available
# open 1
LV Size 223.57 GB
Current LE 57235
Segments 1
Allocation inherit
Read ahead sectors 0
Block device 253:2
# mkfs.ext3 /dev/lvm-raid/lvm0
.
.
# mount /dev/lvm-raid/lvm0 /mnt
# df -h /mnt
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/lvm--raid-lvm0
224G 93M 224G 1% /mnt
# /sbin/mdadm /dev/md0 -f /dev/hdb1 mdadm: set /dev/hdb1 faulty in /dev/md0
Once the system has determined a drive has failed or is otherwise missing (you can shut down and pull out a drive and reboot to similate a drive failure or use the command to manually fail a drive above it will show something like this in mdadm:
# /sbin/mdadm --detail /dev/md0
Update Time : Wed Jun 15 11:30:59 2005
State : clean, degraded
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
Failed Devices : 1
Spare Devices : 0
.
.
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 3 1 0 active sync /dev/hda1
1 0 0 - removed
2 33 65 2 active sync /dev/hdf1
You'll notice in this case I had /dev/hdb
fail. I replaced it with a new drive with the same capacity and was
able to add it back to the array. The first step is to partition
the new drive just like when first creating the array. Then you
can simply add the partition back to the array and watch the status
as the data is rebuilt onto the newly replace drive.
# /sbin/mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/hdb1
# /sbin/mdadm --detail /dev/md0
Update Time : Wed Jun 15 12:11:23 2005
State : clean, degraded, recovering
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 3
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 1
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Rebuild Status : 2% complete
.
.
During the rebuild process the system performance may be somewhat
impacted but the data should remain in-tact.
I'm told it's now possible to expand the size of a RAID array much as you could on a commercial array such as the NetApp. The link below describes the procedure. I have yet to try it but it looks promising:Growing a RAID5 array - http://scotgate.org/?p=107
Encrypting /home and swap over RAID with dm-crypt - Do you have important company files on your PC at home, that you can neither afford to lose, nor let fall into the wrong hands? This page explains how to set up encrypted RAID1 ext3 filesystems with dm-crypt, along with an encrypted RAID0 swap, on RedHat / Fedora Core 5, using the twofish encryption algorithm and dm-crypt's new ESSIV mode.
|
Donate via Paypal:
All these guides are done on my personal time as a community service.
Please consider a donation to allow me to allocate the time to put
these together: |
| This comments section below is only for comments, suggestions or corrections for this guide only. Please do not use this for general Fedora/Linux support. If you do require support for something other than what's described here I recommend using Fedora Forums. |